The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar chart compares the proportion of changes in average real estate values in Algeria, China and Argentina from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that Algeria witnessed steady decline throughout the period, whereas China's values grew enormously and Argentina had instability during the same period.
In terms of details, the figures in China doubled between the first two years of the period, from initial of 2% to just over 4% in 2008, and then it followed by a sharp rise, levelling off above 6 per cent in 2010. Algeria's growth of property price comprised about 6% in 2007, however, it then gradually fell by 1.5% until the end of a period, accounting for only about a percent eventually.
According to the Argentina's percentage, conversely, there was recorded a pattern of rise and tumble. After reaching its own peak at 5% in 2008, the average rate of real estate plunged to almost 1 per cent in the next year. Lastly, the proportion of growth recovered to approximately 2.5% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | harvle | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | Võ Ngân | 61 | view |
- The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010. 89
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects sho 73
- The graphs below show the growth in wages within the G7 Nations between 2000 2007 and 2008 2012 88
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, lastly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87134502924 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67478501588 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654970760234 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9342920232 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161782788146 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726927296162 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061373502252 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928540161609 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615044894115 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.