The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005.
The line chart illustrates the proportion of cars measured in the United Kingdom between 1975 and 2005.
It can clearly be seen that there was a gradual increase in the rate of cars in the UK over the period of 30 years. In particular, households owning a car reached the highest pointed in 2005 while households with three cars experienced the lowest figure.
Looking at the information in more detail, at the beginning of the period shown, the proportion of people owning a car reached the peak at 45% marks, with that in the figure for households without a car not far behind (nearly 44%). In the same year, the percentage of households owning three cars was about 6%, which was at least three times as high as that in the households owning two cars. After ten years, the rate of people without a car and people having a car were witnessed a considerable decrease to approximately 38% and 24%, respectively, while those of households having two and three cars saw a gradual increase to roughly 5% and 13%, correspondingly.
As illustrated, the rate of one-car households showed a significantly upward movement to around 45% at the end of the period shown. In the same year, the percentage of households without a car slightly fall to nearly 22% while those of people having two and three cars experienced an increase to 18% and almost 10%, respectively. The most striking feature is that the proportion of people owing two and three cars witnessed a gradual growth from 1975 to 2005 while the percentage of households without a car and households with regular use of a car underwent a dramatic change during the same period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | quynhan1995 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | quynhan1995 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of men and women who did various free time activities in England in 2006 49
- In many countries the cost of living is rising What are the effects on individuals and society What measures can be taken to deal with this problem 90
- Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 78
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, at least, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 283.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77738515901 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81158863517 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448763250883 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2698947282 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.222222222 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4444444444 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266314799364 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131730485606 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538912671912 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189237371302 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178655621708 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.