The Chart graph compares the porcentage of participation in world population of eight regions with the porcentage of representation on global Wealth of each one. At glance there is an inverse relation between the participation in global population an wealth.
On the one hand, North America, Europe and Rich Asia pacific have just only the 25% of the population. However, these three regions have the 90% of the total global wealth . The biggest difference is in North America, where their popuplation represents a 5% of the total one, and their wealtness is almost the 35% of the word. Another case to highlight, is Rich Asia pacific that has the same porcentage of population than North America and owns the 25% of global wealth
On the other Hand, China, other asia pacific, india, africa an latin america & caribean are the opposite case. In spite of having the more than the 75% of the total global popultation, this places have just only the 10% of the wealthness. As an example, is interesting to highlight the situation in china which has a huge representation of 25% in global population but just only less than 5% in global wealth.
All in All, while some developed zones have less population than representation in global wealth, developing regions have bigger participation in population.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 61
- In many countries today insufficient respect is shown to older people What do you think may be the reasons for this What problems might this cause in society 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the participation in global population an wealth. On the one hand, North Ameri...
^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... have the 90% of the total global wealth . The biggest difference is in North Amer...
^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...hina, other asia pacific, india, africa an latin america & caribean are the opposi...
^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e less population than representation in global wealth, developing regions have b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.97073170732 453% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02764976959 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88028335287 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506912442396 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4522432294 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147017354205 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735680768851 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458425786484 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101760037592 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334297176823 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.