The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2019 and future projections in 2025.
The bar graph compares the revenue from the three main exports in Southland in 2000 and 2019 and predicted figures in 2025. Units are measured in billions of pound sterlings.
Overall, the income from international tourism increased slightly and this trend is expected to continue in 2025, while in meat products it is projected to decrease continuously and will remain the lowest source of revenue. It is also noticeable that dairy products' figure fluctuated over the period given.
Southlands' income from international tourism was the biggest by far in 2000 at around £8 billion, then rose by nearly £1 billion within this year. The figure is forecast that it will peak at almost £10 billion in 2025, to become again the leading export. By contrast, revenue from meat products declined from £6billion in 2000 to approximately £5.5 billion this year and will hit a low of £5 billion in 2025.
With regard to dairy products, the number began at £7 billion in 2000 but rocketed to £10 billion this year, which is the highest revenue and this is shown to drop by about a half billion pound sterlings in 2025.
- The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 56
- The pie charts below show the percentages of each material thrown out by the average household in California in 1985 and 2002. 78
- Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest time of most people's lives. Others think that adult life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibility.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- The bar graph below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010 70
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54007219563 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3804043973 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156518455129 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765877872388 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806209962269 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111779511303 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694548753808 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.