The chart below gives information on the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information on the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.

The chart below gives information on the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
The chart illustrates how many social networking sites (one, two, three, four, five sites or no sites) people in Canada worked with in the period 2014-2015 in percentage.
It can be clearly seen that that in 2015 the percentage of the Canadians who preferred to use two or more sites was higher than in 2014 at the same time in 2014 they used mostly one site or did not use it all.
It is interesting to note that in 2014 the proportion of the Canadians from both categories “No site” and “One site” was the biggest (58%) but in 2015 it declined to 49%. The trend for increasing the numbers of multiple sites users might be noticed for such categories as “Two sites”, “Three sites”, “Four sites” and “Five sites”. In 2014 these categories contained 42% of users from Canada while in 2015 their numbers raised to 52%. The biggest growth was in the category “Five sites” there the numbers of users doubled from 2014 to 2015.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-14 Ieltsbg 56 view
2022-11-14 Ieltsbg 56 view
2022-08-29 Hanabi view
2022-01-27 Chloe Pham view
2022-01-19 koshagohil 67 view
Essays by user Redheel :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mostly one site or did not use it all. It is interesting to note that in 2014 t...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70053475936 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41590524023 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5184821792 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.571428571 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544271699048 0.215688989381 252% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.323032944336 0.103423049105 312% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.284744177766 0.0843802449381 337% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.459800451339 0.15604864568 295% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.316520748222 0.0819641961636 386% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.