The chart below illustrates the result of a survey on the types of houses people liked, taken in 2005.
The bar graph demonstrate the various type of house result was liked by the individuals which who survey find by the British over the time period of 2005.
Overall, what stand out from the graph is that while popularity of the Cambridge flats grow over the period in question, and that of detached houses remained high through out, the number of people depended on semi detached houses and is rapidly changed. Terraced houses, mean while, saw an increase followed by drop.
With regard to terraced houses and semi detached houses, the starting figures of London roughly identical at 16 and 18 percent people's respectively. However, where as the flats climbed in London and reached 58 percent. Before levelling off for the remainder of period, the Cambridge in detached house slipped to half this figure.
Turning to the higher buildings, flats stayed consistently popular, with houses figure remaining between 58 and 8 percent throughout the period. Oxford terraced houses popularity was nearly as high as semi detached in Cambridge. With the number of houses rising 15 to 18 percent.but 2005 saw flats rising in London crash to 17 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-25 | Gurpreet_5577 | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-25 | Gurpreet_5577 | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-25 | Gurpreet_5577 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-25 | Gurpreet_5577 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-25 | Sukchain appur 56 | 78 | view |
- Life cycle of frog . 89
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems.some believe that need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems.other however believe technology is the way to solve these problems. 61
- The bar graph highlight the number of museum. 67
- The maps below show the village of stockeford in 1930 and 2010. 10
- The chart below illustrates the result of a survey on the types of houses people liked, taken in 2005. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...d that of detached houses remained high through out, the number of people depended on semi ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: meanwhile
...nd is rapidly changed. Terraced houses, mean while, saw an increase followed by drop. Wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... percent peoples respectively. However, where as the flats climbed in London and reached...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08510638298 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5447778036 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3456032804 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158948589303 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648958651407 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599313632054 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110845496255 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592660423566 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.