The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts below illustrate the medium proportions in ordinasry meals of three genres of nutrients including sodium, saturated fat and added sugar, all of which are consumed in the USA.
Looking at the chart, it is evident that both of the highest consumption of sodium and saturated fat are at lunch, while the highest figure for added sugar consumption is at snacks. All three kinds of nutrients are least digested at breakfast.
In breakfast, sodium only makes up for 14% of the meal. Until lunch, the amount of sodium consumed rises to about 29%, a surge of 15% in comparison with a slight growth by 10% of saturated fat. 16% of added sugar are taken in at breakfast, before experiencing a moderate jump to 19% at lunch.
The figure for sodium eaten at dinner is considerably higher than at snacks (43% and 14% respectively), therefore, a rapid plunge by 29% is registered. Similarly, saturated fat reaches its peak at dinner at 37%, but then plummet sharply to approximately 21% at snacks. By contrast, a downward trend is seen in the percentage of added sugar, climbing from 23% at dinner to 42% at snacks.
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships Do you think the advantages of those developments outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion 56
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 86
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s 43% and 14% respectively, therefore, a rapid plunge by 29% is registered. Simil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, similarly, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80412371134 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76023106726 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.499687889 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0869695702585 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505561804784 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566130687838 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075246749838 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591347906266 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.