In many places, people’s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships. Do you think the advantages of those developments outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent decades, the pace of living is increasing fast, contributing to manifold radical changes in inhabitant’s lifestyle. These alterations exert extremely profound effects on the relationships between family members consisting of both negative and positive sides. As far as I am concerned, the advantages of this development seem to be overshadowed by a huge array of disadvantages.
It is indisputable that modifications in a dweller's way of living do wonders for family relationships. due to the proliferation of technology, a tremendous number of people are now owning at least a private communication device such as mobile phones or tablets. Therefore, it is incredibly easy for them to be in touch with family members living far away. Consequently, their connection may be strongly solidified. For instance, various social network applications like facebook or Instagram allow users to make video calls to others, giving abundant opportunities to have remote conversations among people.
Nevertheless, a host of detrimental effects have been proven to outweigh those perks. An adamant rationale is redundant access to technically advanced gadgets make residents be engrossed in their captivation. To be more specific, the more time is spent on exposure to technology, the less time is allocated to family. Hence, the inextricable relationships between family members have gradually been attenuated. Another significant justification is that people are inclined to have an outrageous hectic schedule owing to their occupations. Thus, the work life balance is no longer maintained, acting as a contributor to the loss of time spent for family.
To sum up, there is a plus point regarding remote communication in alteration of lifestyle, however, I sustain my advocacy of the belief that citizen’s lifestyle changes are exacerbating family relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-11 | dinhthu05 | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-17 | phghuyn | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-09 | jihyun_2h | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-01 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-01 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships Do you think the advantages of those developments outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 73
- Some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable and there are more beneficial ways to spend money Do you agree or disagree 60
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...ng do wonders for family relationships. due to the proliferation of technology, a t...
^^^
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...chnology, a tremendous number of people are now owning at least a private communication device...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, at least, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65602836879 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46169951222 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5144128866 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147351487444 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431204994424 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381074787421 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084682171725 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287022159798 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.