The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
Leisure time in a typical week in hour- by sex and employment status, 1998-99.
The bar chart depicts the number of hours spent leisurely by men and women per week of different employment status during 1998 to 1999.
It is clear from the chart that maximum leisure time was spent by unemployed and retired males and females, and there was no man who worked as a part time employee or housemaker. Also, men seemed to had more leisure hours than their counterpart in all types of employment.
Those who were recruited as a full time employees were tend to had less leisure time as compared to the rest of categories, where about 44 hours weekly were spent by men and women spent 6 hours less than them. Unemployed and retired section of people used to spend almost similar time in leisure activities, which was around 85 hours for men and 78 hours for women. Weekly 40 hours were accounted by part time employed females, and 50 hours were accounted by housewives, where men were not present.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | cupinsiuway | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | cupinsiuway | 81 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | Siva_K | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | mrinal | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status 19 84
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- Dear Sir Madam I am writing this letter to express my dissatisfaction with currently provided accommodation in a college hostel I am sharing my room with Sneha Patel who is two years junior to me Although I do not have any personal issues with Sneha it is 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagrams below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both these views and give 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...s, and there was no man who worked as a part time employee or housemaker. Also, men seeme...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...yment. Those who were recruited as a full time employees were tend to had less leisure...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...recruited as a full time employees were tend to had less leisure time as compared to...
^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...omen. Weekly 40 hours were accounted by part time employed females, and 50 hours were acc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65432098765 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3917502881 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.7136063182 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314156042114 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170102437525 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678165333201 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233855110076 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597160219819 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.