The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period

Essay topics:

The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.

Above given charts depicts how much money British parents have invested for their children's sports and the games in which children have participated over the period of 7 years.

From the first chart, it is seen that in 2008 parents used to spend average 20 pounds for their children's sports, which was gradually increased every year and reached at the maximum of 32 pounds on an average in 2014.

The second chart shows three sports where children participared from 2008 to 2014. In 2008, athletics was the least popular choice among children, where about 1 million children participated.In the year of 2011 it was as famous as swimming, where around 2.5 million children took part in each. FootBall was always prioritised by children. For the first 3 years it has seen steady participation around 7.7 million, which took a leap and settelled at 9 million in 2014.

It is clearly visible that parents had increasingly shown interest in speding money for sports for their children and gradually number of children who participated in the sports is also grew for all of three games.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-18 Phuong1810 89 view
2023-07-22 Mei1312 84 view
2023-01-31 my220904 78 view
2022-11-15 khangoccho 84 view
2022-09-13 felixchen view
Essays by user jinalbarot :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...e about 1 million children participated.In the year of 2011 it was as famous as sw...
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
... who participated in the sports is also grew for all of three games.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95628415301 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59446047926 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5224213521 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.571428571 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406803170138 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202020734932 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119176966146 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248411182371 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611666304899 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.