Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Infrastructure industry has captivated everyone's attention in recent years, as there is an ongoing debate among the authorities and the government officials regarding the freedom for designing the newly constructed buildings. While a section of people think that it should in in favor of the government, the rest support the builders who actually invest for the construction. This essay will discuss both the sides and explain why my thoughts go along with the latter.
To begin with, those who believe that the decision of designing should be possessed by government may argue that it helps the government to develop buildings in symmetrical fashion. As a result, city will look like a planned one and may seem more picturesque to the tourists. Also, it will create cultural impression in the world. For example, in Dubai, majority of buildings are constructed in an identical manner that represent Arabic architecture and capture billions of tourists every year.
In contrast, the investors feel that the design should be in alignment of its purpose rather than other buildings in its neighborhood. If they would not be given the freedom of designing the exterior according to their choice, then it may create monologue architecture all across the city, and the architects will not get a chance to showcase their talent. Eventually, such cities would fail to intrigue tourists as well the residents to visit different places. For instance, in a recently conducted survey, approximately 98% of people prefer to see differently designed buildings in the city. They claim that the exterior capture their attention and encourage them to visit it.
In conclusion, I assert that the freedom of designing the buildings should be kept with the financial sponsors rather than the government, as they have more rational reasons to support their view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | Nanddy | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ndiep | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | jk1692 | 73 | view |
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- In many countries today crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular Why do you think these books and TV shows are popular What are your opinion on crime fiction and TV crime dramas 73
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status 19 84
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
... section of people think that it should in in favor of the government, the rest suppo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an identical manner" with adverb for "identical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., majority of buildings are constructed in an identical manner that represent Arabic architecture and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25675675676 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88177061877 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3797015655 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353504038094 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10435257681 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087461531289 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198611775389 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027844751933 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.