Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one

Essay topics:

Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative one?

In the recent era where cellphones have become ubiquitous, some educational authorities have restrained their usage for students and teachers and argue that excessive use of mobiles within campus can adversely impact both of them. Do mobiles play any vital role in a school that their usage should be considered valid? In my opinion, the decision of schools to stop bringing mobile to the classes is one of the necessary steps to be taken. This essay will discuss the reasons why it is an advantageous development and how it will make a progressive impact.

Firstly, the cellphone is one of the most distractive and addictive devices to own. In schools, where students need to focus on study and faculties on teaching, they can be proven noisy. For example, students keep checking on their phones to track the courier, which they suppose to receive. It may bolster the constant urge of looking at the screen, then they lost concentration in the subject and eventually may lose interest due to lack of understanding. Hence, phones should not be allowed within premises or limited to the outside of class.

In addition to that, mobiles keep the person busy, which is not a good sign for socialization. If students in school do not communicate with each other in person and are on their phones, then they will not make friends and not understand the need for human interaction, which may badly impact their communication skills in the long run.

However, phones can bring an abundance source of information to our fingertips, and with the use of them, the internet can be easily accessible. It can help solve the doubts for teachers or students and keep themselves up to date with the innovation happening around the world.

Conclusively, limiting the access of mobiles in schools is a positive step, as it may allow the pupils and faculties to concentrate on the study as well as maintain the relationship with the people surrounding them.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-24 aesha123 73 view
2021-09-24 aesha123 73 view
2021-01-15 Haseya 92 view
2020-11-15 dishanmu 89 view
2020-11-15 dishanmu 89 view
Essays by user jinalbarot :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, so, then, well, for example, in addition, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93975903614 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77255068589 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545180722892 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5336443615 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212823634221 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650752964364 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399549695103 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104694588029 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641466537517 0.056905535591 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.