Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Student life is the phase of learning abundance of fundamentals which may be helpful at later stage of life. In recent times, there is an ongoing dispute among people whether students should be taught cooking as a part of syllabus or not. This essay will elucidate why I believe that it should not be introduced as a subject in the schools and expand both sides of the arguments.
Firstly, students already have number of mandatory subjects to learn in schools such as physics, mathamatics, biology, languages, etc. These are paramount for higher studies as well as in personal life. For example, subject of languages help students to learn grammar, understanding usage and improve their communication skill, which is absolutely significant in all aspects of life. Therefore, If board would decide to include it in curriculum, student may not get much time to concentrate on important subjects.
Moreover, cooking is an art, which can be learnt at any age and not everyone can master it, even if it would be inculcate to them from early age. Also, it is not the rudimentary skill that everybody is obliged to own.
On the other hand, those who argue that science of food and it's recipes deserve place in school syllabus may argue that it is an imperative lifeskill and can be prooven beneficial in long term. For instance, student who go for studies in foreign countries would be able to prepare food according to his taste and choice and would be easly thrive as compared to others who does not know it.
To conclude, Cooking can be profitable to the person who knows it; however, it is not one of the compulsory skill to master in school days, there are other more vital subjects to focus on. Hence, it should be classified as a compulsory subject for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-16 | HappyCandy | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-20 | kevinzultaf | 66 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | HappyCandy | 78 | view |
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- Dear Sir Madam I am writing this letter to express my dissatisfaction with currently provided accommodation in a college hostel I am sharing my room with Sneha Patel who is two years junior to me Although I do not have any personal issues with Sneha it is 73
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagrams below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 1.00243902439 1496% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 305.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82295081967 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65745744764 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 106.607317073 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580327868852 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 283.868780488 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6603221965 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.153846154 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256566047286 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888495194091 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464957832398 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134549948947 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573810975261 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 1.00243902439 1496% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 305.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82295081967 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65745744764 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 106.607317073 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580327868852 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 283.868780488 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6603221965 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.153846154 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256566047286 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888495194091 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464957832398 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134549948947 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573810975261 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.