The graph chart presented shows the numbers of incidents regarding criminal actions that took place in Newport city from 2003 to 2012. Burglary, car theft and robbery are analysed.
In small dots we can find robbery, a criminal action that consist of a theft from a person. This presents a stable characteristic and it stays in a range between 500 and 1000 incidents per year.
Car thefts, indicated by small lines, start at 2700 cases in 2003 and they see a reduction in 2006, dropping at a rate of 2000 incidents. Since 2006 they start to increase again, indeed in 2012 their number reach 2650.
Another story regards burglary. We can find a peak in 2004, 3700 cases, but a rapid descent since this year. In fact, the number of incidents drop to 1100 in 2008, becoming less than car thefts. From 2008 number of cases regarding burglary become stable never reaching 1500 cases per year.
This graph let us see the changes that happened in these years in Newport city. Comparing 2012 to 2003 only burglary changed and saw a drop. Instead car theft and robbery present the same numbers for both years.
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 67
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras In many case theh people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City centre from 2003 2012 Summarise and information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge and exper 61
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and further projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...3 only burglary changed and saw a drop. Instead car theft and robbery present the same ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71649484536 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28154951048 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613402061856 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0689854856 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3846153846 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9230769231 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119031150885 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445751514988 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779111279519 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081383916995 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853567750331 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.5 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.