The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in newport City centre from 2003 to 2012.
The rendered polyline graph depicts comparison among three crimes namely burglary, car theft, robbery over the period of 2003 to 2012 in Newport city.
In 2003, burglary was reported the highest crime rate at just below 3500 incidents, later it reached its peak in 2004 before declining to just above 3000 accidents in 2005. From 2005 to 2008 it fell dramatically by around 2,000 cases which was its bottom point. After this it went through a flactuating trend for a lustrum from approximately 1200 to 1400 crime rates.
Proving further to the Car theft, initially, it had experienced around 2800 cases which showed similar figures for two years. Although it experienced a slight decline at just above 2000 incidents by 2006, it rose again and followed the zigzag pattern for the following years up to 2800 cases. While crime rates in terms of robbery had not been noticed much variations and reported the 500 to 900 cases in the given span of time.
To sum up, in the beginning crime related to burglary accounted for the highest number, whereas at last robbery replaced the former one. Burglary went through a significant changes throughout the period, while crimes like a car theft and robbery had not observed much variations in a trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-18 | Hung@vietnam | view | |
| 2021-10-19 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | deeparsh | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | Gagandhillon | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-24 | Pattrick Jane | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in newport City centre from 2003 to 2012 84
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past do you think this is positive or negative development 56
- The threat of nuclear Weapons maintain world peace but nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy the benefits of nuclear technology for outweigh the disadvantages to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is positive or negative development 56
- Many people believe that University students should pay tuition fee in full themselves because they gain education for their won benefits and not for the society Tu to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...n terms of robbery had not been noticed much variations and reported the 500 to 900 ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...e. Burglary went through a significant changes throughout the period, while crimes lik...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... car theft and robbery had not observed much variations in a trend.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92890995261 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47216257354 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620853080569 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9572297786 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143082959532 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057424001466 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459851350087 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927482700439 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514435466419 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.