The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005
The pie charts present the contrasts of variation in energy production in France in one decade, especially from 1995 to 2005. Briefly, the chart inferred that the most significant change was in the percentage of Petro.
With regards to data, in 1995, the most used energy was coal, followed by Gas. In this case, the two kinds of energy reflected over a quarter of all sources of energy and were still the most popular in 2005. Regarding 1995, the third most common energy used in France was petro, unfortunately, in 2005, petro was greatly decreased by 10 points to only 19,55%.
The slight change showed stability in the same kind of energy. In fact, the stable energy was coal even in 1995 and 2005, which made it the first energy most taken in France throughout the period. Besides, there are still two kinds of energy that grow up narrowly: nuclear energy went up to 10,10% and other energy reached out to 9,10%.
- In money countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 61
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 61
- Nowdays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack of sleep cause What can be done about lack of sleep 84
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, briefly, first, if, regarding, so, still, third, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74074074074 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29686041126 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9040131086 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346796270206 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156488249669 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765352842309 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24831557504 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288612310242 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.