The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on 5 consumer goods in France and the UK in 2010.
Overall, both France and the UK spent most of their money on cars out of the five categories of consumer goods. People in the UK spend around 450,000 as opposed to the French at 400,000.
Next item, the French spent more on computers than the British at 375,000 and 350,000 respectively. Similarly, the British expenditure was higher on books than the French at 400,000 and 300,000 respectively.
Once again, the French beat out the British on perfume spending at 200,000 to about 140,000 respectively. But, when it comes to cameras that is another story. The spending on cameras for the British was more than double that of the French which came in at slightly more than 350,000 as oppose to 150,000 for the French.
In summary, the French loved to use their computers while smelling nice and the British loved their cars, enjoy the books and snapping lots of pictures
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 56
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods 11
- The number of subscribers paid for fixed telephone lines and cell phones in Africa from 1994 and 2004. 61
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate. 73
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... goods in France and the UK in 2010. Overall, both France and the UK spent mo...
^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: AS_OPPOSE_TO_AS_OPPOSED_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as opposed to'?
Suggestion: as opposed to
...h came in at slightly more than 350,000 as oppose to 150,000 for the French. In summary, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, while, as for, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80588235294 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43225869367 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.584102893 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.053789525752 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322226354124 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601456055607 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0507341849027 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723739603582 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.