The given bar chart depicts the information of 5 different human-needed things, namely cars, cameras, computers, books as well as perfume, which were sold in France and UK last 12 years.
Overall, it can be seen that costumers in both regions bought more cars than other goods in that calculated year. It is also clear that except computers and perfume, UK gain more profit than France on the remaining 3 sectors.
Looking at the bar graph, while 450000 pounds of cars were sold in UK, only 400000 of that were bought by French. Furthermore, computers also attracted Frenh by more than 350000 punds were sold out, that number decreased un the rate of laptop's UK users. In contrast, English purchased more books than French, with the particular numbers are 400000 and 300000, respectively.
Regarding to the chart, it is noticeable that the gap between cameras' consumer in 2 countries is the biggest gap of the chart in total, about 200000 pounds higher in the orange sector. The remaining 200000 and 148000 punds are allocated in the data of the consumption of fragance, making it the smallest number of the graph.
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults aged 16 years and over whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months 78
- In some countries there are fewer young people who listen to or play classical music these days Why is this Should young people be encouraged to play or perform classical music 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1000 people in 2003 in 6 different counties Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91578947368 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5421434017 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0731835202 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0769022294231 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313288177215 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549479128556 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0488019236105 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480085294892 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.