The chart below shows the figure for international conferences held in three different cities between 1980 and 2010
The line chart illustrates the number of international conferences organised in three other town over the time frame.
As can be seen from the chart, it was clear that whereas the vast majorities of international meetings of city A and B witnessed a downward trend, the opposite was true for the figure for city C. The number of international conferences organised in town C increased dramatically over the period shown.
In 1980, the figure for international meetings taking place in city A reached a peak of exactly 35. This figure was roughly 12 higher than the number of international conferences held in city B, compared to presicely 0 in city C.
By 2010, there was a significant rise in the number of international meetings held in city C, at by approximately 16 from 1980 to 1985, after which this figure declined slightly to 14 in 1990. This figure soared to exactly 35, which came top, at which point this figure reduced dramatically to precisely 25, before going up slowly to about 29 in 2010. In contrast, the number of international meetings organised in town A declined slightly by about 15 between 1980 and 2010. Similarly, the vast majority of international conferences held in city B went down to roughly by 7 by 1990, after which this figure climbed slowly to 21 in 1995, before reducing gradually to exactly 15 in 2010.
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 78
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationship Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99435073376 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9085374077 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393079024115 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180943302973 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556135679234 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249446456822 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558109661947 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99435073376 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9085374077 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393079024115 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180943302973 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556135679234 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249446456822 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558109661947 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.