The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar graph exhibits that information about the gross domestic production growth rate of Japan, Tunisia and Ecuador during the given years 2007 to 2010.
Overall, it can be incurred that the growth rate of GPS in Japan inclined continually, a trend opposite to Tunisia, while in Ecuador it fluctuated.
Primarily, it is vividly apparent that the Japan and Tunisia growth rate of gross production not same with each other infact, it was exactly opposite. In the foremost case, it was recorded be only 2% that increased continually throughout the time period reaching at the 6.5% in 2010, it was maximum growth rate of this year. Conversely, in the latter case from the maximum growth rate of GDP in 2007 was nearby 6% then, it falls down only 3% in 2010.
Continuing further, remaining country in 2007 highest growth production was approximately 5% but, in very next year it falls down and it was just 1.5%. In 2007, it was recorded to be 2% and it increased more than 1% in the 2010.
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food which is having a negative effect on both family and society. How far this statement is true use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- In many countries recently young people have been living far from their parents from the time they began studies or work until they married. Do you think there are more advantages or disadvantages of this trend? 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 61
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 92
- The diagram below shows time spent watching tv by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71676300578 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57771065125 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560693641618 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9672580825 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195975568493 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105647314031 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048880258556 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125393680949 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524202783062 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.