In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food which is having a negative effect on both family and society. How far this statement is true use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is incontrovertible fact that nowadays eating fast food habit became a trend. The traditional food are losing their charming day by day and the fast food attract the people more than compared to the home made food. However, it would be wrong to say that it have complete negative impact on both family and society because it has some positive impact. I will discuss the points of view in upcoming paragraphs.
To embark with, there are plethora of reasons why the traditional food has effected the society and family. The first and foremost is consumption of fast food and junk food is related to the health problems. The people are facing the numerous problems regarding their health like obesity, high cholesterol and skin problems. Moreover, nowadays mostly people prefer to eat junk food and the value of traditional food decreased day by day. In fact, now some traditional dish are no eaten by the people. For example, in punjab old people like to eat the but young people no like to eat it.
To continue with my view points, it killed the family bonding because in the pastime family enjoying the food together. But, now many children's and adult just sit in front of the TV and eat from fast food packets held in their hands. It is harmful for the health as well as for the relationship.
On the other hand, in this 24 hours working culture, people have no interest to prepare to the meal at home. So, the mostly people prefer to eat fast food because, it seems one of the best and right option. As well as, it is easy to prepare and always available in the market. In this way, the fast food spot the life of people. Moreover, in this era every person needs the work and the fast food international companies give the myriad jobs of the person. As well as, people do the work in these companies and increased the economy of the country.
In conclusion, each coin have aspects. If the fast food have bad impact on the society and family it has some positive effect. This food impact the health of the people but helpful in the modern lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | Tikshan123 | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-25 | mandeep bal | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 61
- The diagram below shows time spent watching tv by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 61
- Should money be spent on space exploration or it can be better used to reduce poverty Discuss 80
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food which is having a negative effect on both family and society. How far this statement is true use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food which is having a negative effect on both family and societies. How far this statement is true use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58378378378 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38797205148 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2507487197 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0909090909 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277582545292 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857698826433 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674060924906 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171149608278 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380048556697 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.