The bar chart gives illustrates how often people in USA had their meals at fast food restaurants in the years between 2003 and 2013.
Overall, in the years of 2003 and 2006, most of the people preferred visiting fast food restaurants once a week while in 2013 this rate dropped. In 2013, majority of the people started visiting restaurant at a frequency of once or twice a month. In comparison, people rarely ate at fast food restaurants everyday and this pattern remained constant over the years
In the year of 2003, only 4% people ate at fast food restaurants every day. This figure saw a dramatic rise with about 16% of the people eating at fast food restaurants several times a week. And then it reached to nearly to a third with 31% people preferring to dine out at fast food restaurants once a week. The preference of going out to eat fast food once or twice a month came to a close second with 30% people preferring this option. But there was a sharp drop in these figures as only about 13% of the people went to fast food restaurants few times a year and 5% people never dining out at restaurants.
In the year of 2006, a tiny fraction of people (3%) liked to eat out at fast food restaurants every day. While 20% of the people ate out several times a week, the amount peaked at 33% people preferring to eat out once a week. Like 2003, the figure experienced a gradual drop again after the “once a week” option. Only 25%, 15% and 4% people visited restaurants once or twice a month , a few times a year and never respectively.
In the year of 2013, while only 3% people had their meals at restaurants every day , almost 16% people preferred eating out several times of the week. This number experienced a gradual rise with 27% people dining out once a week and 33% people dining out once or twice per month. Then the number significantly dropped to 15% for the option of eating out “a few times a year”. And a small minority (4%) did not eat at fast food restaurants at all.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 69
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 67
- The charts below show the average consumption of three nutrients by adults in the UK All of these nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ple rarely ate at fast food restaurants everyday and this pattern remained constant over...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pattern remained constant over the years In the year of 2003, only 4% people ate ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rn remained constant over the years In the year of 2003, only 4% people ate at...
^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...isited restaurants once or twice a month , a few times a year and never respective...
^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...had their meals at restaurants every day , almost 16% people preferred eating out ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 965.302439024 169% => OK
No of words: 367.0 196.424390244 187% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44959128065 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45647177217 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.381471389646 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 283.868780488 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2313992399 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0625 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4375 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2222444512 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110639598626 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757387315487 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188255878005 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765587918595 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.45 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.