The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar graph gives us information on how often do people from the United States of America ate in fast food chains from year 2003 to 2013. Overall, it can be seen that there is a similar trend in the regularity of Americans who eat in a fast food restaurant between year 2003 and 2006 where most of them prefer to eat fast food at least once a week only, while in 2013, Americans preferred to eat in a bistro by once or twice amount only.
In 2003 and 2006, American’s who preferred to eat junk foods every day was only about 5%- 3% which has an almost similar amount of people who never consume fast foods. It is also interesting to see that in these years, most American ate in fast food restaurants once a week by almost 32% in 2003 and about 34 % in 2006 which is close to the number of Americans who prefer to eat just once or twice a month by about 30% by 2003 but has a sudden decline by about 25% in 2006.
Percentage of Americans who often ate in fast food restaurants decreased by 20 % in the year 2013 where they prefer to eat once or twice amount only compared to those who ate once a week in year 2003 and 2006.
- THE PERCENTAGE OF OVERWEIGHT CHILDREN IN WESTERN SOCIETY HAS INCREASED BY 20 % IN THE LAST 10 YEARS. DISCUSS THE CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THIS DISTURBING TREND 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic.Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS THE POLLUTION LEVELS IN LONDON BETWEEN 1600 AND 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a bistro by once or twice amount only. In 2003 and 2006, American's who pr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.15 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26744873287 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486363636364 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8383123665 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.6 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.0 22.9334400587 192% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258699971369 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16788763449 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452346037529 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203815148695 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617666223025 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.2 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.68 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.