The chart below shows information about..
The bar chart illustrates the changes of accommodation cost in five different cities in the two periods : 1990-1995 and 1996 to 2002 compared to 1989
All in all, only housing prices of Madrid and Frankfurt increased in the first period. During the second one,Tokyo was the only city that experienced a downward trend while London had the most significant rise.
It is clear from the chart that from 1990 to 1995, Madrid and Frankfurt had their figures climbed up to about 3% and 2% respectively. Meanwhile, the prices of New York, compared to 1989, decresed by exactly 5% and the decline in the accommodation cost of Tokyo and London was the most dramatic, by around 8% each.
Between 1996 to 2002, the cost of houses in Tokyo plunged slightly by 5%. On the other hand, the opposite was true for other cities. London underwent the most noticeable upswing, by about 12%. The stastitics of New York also increased steadily by 5%. Likewise, Madrid had its housing cost rose to about 4% followed by a rocket of around 1% in Frankfurt
- Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment 67
- The chart below shows information about 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Tokyo
... the first period. During the second one,Tokyo was the only city that experienced a do...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61256458816 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7385922731 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862635231497 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370324299136 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461412439308 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0537302658834 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325843434316 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.