The bar chart provides a comparison of the fuel usage of six different European nations, and compares these figures to the European average in 2009 and 2010.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that the fuel consumption in Slovakia and Spain witnessed a downward trend, whereas the reverse was true for Italy, France and Greece during the research period. Additionally, the average fuel used in Europe was higher than all the countries apart from Slovakia.
In 2009, the Europe’s utilized fuel average accounted for 6%, with Slovakia being the highest proportion, almost reaching 9%, about 4% higher than in Austria. Meanwhile, the transport sector in Italy consumed nearly 4,5%, compared to approximately 1% in Greece, which was the lowest figure displayed on the chart. Furthermore, the other nations stood at below 4%.
In 2010, the fuel used in the transport sector of Europe decreased by a percent. To be more detailed, a dramatic fall was experienced by Slovakia to slightly 6%, followed by Spain from about 5% to 3%. In contrast, Italy, France and Greece all increased moderately by roughly 1% in fuel consumption. Meanwhile, the figure for Austria remained stable, at just over 5%.
- Some people think planning future is a waste of time and people should focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 82
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 89
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 95
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21134020619 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76742683577 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613402061856 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9854420896 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344222512443 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127957364448 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111380388283 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201865674944 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482591254094 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.