Many individuals claim that making future plans is an exercise in futility and that living in the present is more significant. Both viewpoints, from my perspective, are of equal importance for one’s well-being and should be lived simultaneously.
On the one hand, I believe it is essential to devise future plans for people to achieve their goals. The primary reason is that people need to have plans aimed at particular goals and dreams to have a sense of purpose that directs their actions without a disoriented view. For instance, entrepreneurs often make meticulously outlined plans for months, even years ahead, enabling them to make use of their time and resources as well as envision possible risk scenarios. However, the future is always uncertain, hence it is also vital to have a back-up plan in case things do not occur as expected.
On the other hand, focusing on the present also plays an integral role in a person’s life. First, many would declare that there are various factors influencing the future, therefore it is out of our control. Hence, we should concentrate on the present moment to be able to respond and react appropriately to our current changing situations and circumstances. Second, spending time worrying about what may happen in the future can cause excessive anxiety, which deprives many individuals of pleasurable feelings in their present life. Furthermore, nobody knows when their life will end, so it is also important to live to the fullest in each passing moment.
In conclusion, I believe maintaining a balance between planning for the future and being in the present is one of the principal key elements to a fulfilled life.
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 89
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 95
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 92
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 87
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11594202899 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86257566267 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61231884058 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5445939934 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206181610975 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712865684462 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446345199527 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112466456205 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278461468099 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.