The bar graphs below compares number of men and women opting for full-tie and part-time higher education in Britain in three periods: 1970/71, 1980/81, 1990/91.
Overall, number of men pursuing full-time education decrease over the given period; while, that of women increased significantly. Part-tie education showed a much similar trend in both genders and it increased over the years.
In early years of 1970/71 women opting for full-time education was comparatively lower (around 700) than men (1000). This was equalized as number of women preferring full-time higher education rose by 100 and that of men reduced by 200; to give a figure of 800. However, in the final year this flipped, with women being at the position where men started (1000) and men maintaining the fall at just over 800.
The rate of enrolling for part-time education by males increased slowly over the years with 100 at the beginning to 200 in the final year; whereas, a significant hike in number of opposite gender was encountered with a rise of approximately 200 from nearly 0. Thus, diminishing the gap between two.
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 78
- some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable, and there are more beneficial ways to spend money. To what extent do you agree. 89
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed. What is the reason behind this? Is this a negative or positive development? 84
- By paying more to employees based on their performance levels, you can keep their motivation high. Do you agree this is the best way to encourage employees? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0773480663 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69845249345 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.864250611 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285438809298 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135356254773 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832944034417 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189414821143 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689327373388 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.