some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable, and there are more beneficial ways to spend money. To what extent do you agree.
Aeronautics is a booming science, with more and more spacecrafts being launched and investing huge amount on developing technology for the same. Some people argue on this expenditure and feel that this money should be directed for effective utilization. However, I partially agree with this thought and will discuss pros and cons of spending money on this sector through this essay.
Firstly, thanks to this high-tech technology that we are using world-wide web and thus, knowledge is just a click away. It is factual, that satellites in space (through which we enjoy video calls, chats etcetera) are the product of exploration of space. Reports on weather and forecast of natural disasters: floods, earthquakes and tsunami are virtues of studies carried out by this sector of science. So, practically, benefits of knowing the space cannot be completely denied.
However, at the same time, it is quite saddening that the space is explored excessively in recent times. The hot topic is “Mangal Yan”: Spacecraft launched by Indians to know more about the planet Mars. Although, some believe that its success will incur foreign currency and humans can shift to Mars if Earth is destroyed etcetera. Personally, I disagree with the thought of visiting other planets because of many factors. First and foremost, as inhabitants of the earth we have contributed very little for its well-being, evident through global warming and natural disasters. So, destroying one more planet is quite unethical by being selfish. Secondly, country’s should meet primary requirements of citizens before spending loads on projects whose success has no certainty. For example, due to this exploration Indians are enjoying “Jio service” at cheaper rate than food but internet cannot be consumed to suffice hunger of people. Thirdly, pollution generated through launch of spaceships is deleterious. And some of the gases like helium are reported to go extinct during this process. Imagining all the countries leaving spacecrafts in the space just because of funding, gives me goose bumps.
Taking all points in consideration, more money should not be spent on developing technology to explore space on account of depriving citizens of basic requirements.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however say that this would have little effect on public health and the other measure are requiredpossibly some of the society possessed h 73
- Organised tours to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for people and environment. 89
- some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable, and there are more beneficial ways to spend money. To what extent do you agree. 89
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However, these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business.Why do you think this is?What could be done to encourage more peop 78
- By paying more to employees based on their performance levels, you can keep their motivation high. Do you agree this is the best way to encourage employees? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1039, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...aunch of spaceships is deleterious. And some of the gases like helium are reported to go ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46438746439 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87565313109 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0649343423 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.947368421 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4736842105 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212299832812 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571643663269 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527607512601 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14363880397 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590788404871 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.