The Chart below shows participation in certain leisure activities by children in Australia.
The given bar graph compares the proportion of boys and girls in the age-group 5 to 14 years who took part in five given leisure pursuits in Australia.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that among all the free time activities, the most liked one was watching tv/videos. Although girls were less active in the majority of the activities, art and craft recorded more number of girls than boys.
According to the given illustration, leading in the chart was the activity of watching tv/video, which reported a similar proportion(100%) among both the genders. After that came electronic/computer games with about four-fifths of boys, up by nearly 20% than girls proportion.
Furthermore, almost 7 in 10 boys preferred to be part of bike riding that was undertaken by just 60% of girls. Also, girls did not seem to be more active in skateboarding as 10% fewer girls showed up as compared to 40% boys. However, a contrasting trend with a noticeable difference was witnessed in art and craft activity, where girls took the lead by 15% as opposed to only 40% of boys.
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day 73
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury A new school S is planned for the area The map shows two possible sites for the school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person Do you think this is the best way to do it or are there better alternatives What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any 89
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 The bar chart shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95135135135 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98379357617 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627027027027 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.0115295731 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0890291459432 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373485534314 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396384655967 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0540663646873 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193021485629 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.