The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart shows that percent of total population ages, which are 65-74, 75-84, 85 and over between 1900 and 2000 in USA.
If we look carefully, the people who were 85 and overage lived by %2 as the lowest percentage in 1900, 1910, 1920 and 1930 while their the highest percentage were %1.5 in 2000. In addition, the people who were between 75 and 84 ages live by %1 as the bottom percentage in 1900 while they lived by %4.4 as peak percentage in 2000. And also, %2.9 of the people who were between 65 and 74 ages lived in 1900 by minimum percentage whereas they lived by %7.3 with having maximum percentage in 2000.
To continue with, the people, who were between 65 and 74 ages had a lots changes by around %4.4 along years according to other ages. And also, it was followed by 75-84 ages with %3.4 and 85+ ages with %1.3.
To sum up, generally all the ages group lived more year during years according to older times, although some years’ percentages changed a little.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-17 | khuekhue | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | khuekhue | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-13 | asmita acharya | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
- The youth in many countries are unemployed and unskilled while at the same time the military services are in need of people Compulsory military service is beneficial and necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 58
- The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries. 78
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 73
- -Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree ? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, whereas, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50279329609 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23733077845 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.2916413528 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232285506659 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146170510873 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791936111633 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15193695951 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968046284204 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.