The chart below shows the percentages of the industry sector's contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000.
The two pie charts make a comparison of the proportion of India and Turkey's economy in eight different industrial sectors in 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that the Indian economy experienced the highest proportion of income from the agriculture sector and the least from the construction part whilst, In Turkey, Health care and education share were overhead to Turkey's economy and minimal allocated by finance.
Firstly, agriculture was the highest contributor to India's economy which comprised almost a quarter(24%) whilst the share of government was just half of agriculture's contribution which was accounted for 12% in 2000. The trade, utilities, and transportation sectors contributed a minority of proportion(14%) to the economy of India. The construction, manufacturing, and finance share towards the Indian economy were below 10 percent, was accounted for 3%, 8%, and 5% respectively. Interestingly, the allocated income on finance, business & other sectors and leisure & hospitality sectors had an equal share which made up 17 %.
In contrast, Economic income from the health and education sector contributed the highest ratio was 17%. Trade, utilities, and transportation were second the highest contributor of Turkey that contributed exactly 16% which was 2% more than India. Income from agriculture and leisure & hospitality fields were the same at 14 % but they both sectors were presented the least contribution as compared to India in the year 2000. The proportion of Turkey's construction section provided 7 % and the manufacturing zone spent 3% more than India's economy. Surprisingly, finance was one of the sectors that were contributed the least proportion of income to both countries and it gives only 8% of the share to Turkey's economy.
- Anyone can post information on the internet Some people say most of what we read on the Internet is inaccurate To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Doctors recommend that older people should get regular exercise However many older people do not take enough exercise What could be the reasons for this What can be done to encourage them to take exercise 73
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on society 73
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is the case happening How should children or teenagers be punished 61
- The chart below shows the percentages of the industry sector s contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 965.302439024 154% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5037037037 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15538733425 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 283.868780488 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4495136395 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.090909091 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34207844237 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151641320118 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904190764096 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243624963735 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931767996818 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 11.4329268293 188% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 965.302439024 154% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5037037037 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15538733425 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 283.868780488 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4495136395 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.090909091 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34207844237 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151641320118 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904190764096 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243624963735 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931767996818 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 11.4329268293 188% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.