The graph illustrates the proportion of three different groups of visitors in Australia paying a visit to zoo, library, theatre and cinema.
Overall, whilst most of native Australian and native migrants immerse cinema, library is the most favourite place for non-native speakers migrating to Australia. In addition, theatre welcomes the least number of tourists compared with others.
It is clear that there are 70% of visitors born in Australia visiting zoo, which is higher than the figures for zoo and library, at around 40%. The proportion is even lower in the number of theatre goers, accounting for only 20%. In terms of English-speaking migrants, the percentage was highest in the number of people going to cinema, at roughly two-thirds of total number of participants asked, compared with 50% and 40% of the figures for zoo and library respectively. Meanwhile, only over a quarter of people in this group choose theatre to visit.
Regarding to non-native newcomers, library and cinema are the two top favourite destinations when there are more and less 50% of them coming these places. Consisting of 33%, zoo is ranked second of four popular places in Australia, followed by theatre with only one tenth of the total opting to go there.
- The chart gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 73
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries india and China. Write a report to university lecture and describe the data. 73
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opini 89
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 61
- Older people often say that their life was better in the past than it is now Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12254901961 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77557919528 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7520813104 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140753705271 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607036497227 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534189642088 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931369299846 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394363270551 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.