The chart below shows the proportion of renewable energy in the total energy supply of 4 countries, from 1997 to 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the percentage of renewable energy in the total energy supply in four various nations namely Australia, Sweden, Iceland, and Turkiye from 1997 to 2010.
Overall, there was an upward trend in both Sweden and Iceland, whereas Australia witnessed a downward trend. Noticeably, Iceland consistently remained in the highest position in the whole period.
In 1997, the proportion of renewable energy in Australia and Turkiye stood at 9% and 39%, respectively. Interestingly, the former decreased slightly by 2%, but the latter increased by 2% in the next 3 years. Thereafter, these two countries’ ratio of renewable energy simultaneously reduced to 5% and 32%.
Another striking feature is that while the percentage of Sweden showed a slight rise, a dramatic increase was recorded in the proportion of Iceland. In 1997, Iceland started at 46%, which was approximately eightfold to the beginning point of Sweden. Later on, the ratio of Iceland successively climbed and reached the peak of 70%, 61% higher than that of Sweden in 2010.
- Causes and effects of Internet addiction 59
- Some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities Other believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The line graph reveals information on Wool Price in New Zealand over a period of 20 years from 1980 to 2000
- Parents should control the screen time of their children Do you agree or disagree 95
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27976190476 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95903986964 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4243621225 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219011471755 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880789332899 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102014095982 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143874423562 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117659748384 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.