The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The given bar chart illustrates the percentage of the coffee and tea consumers in different cities, namely Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart.
It is clear that the most percentage of people went to a cafe for coffee or tea in Melbourne and Hobart. It is also noticeable that going to a cafe for coffee or tea was the most chosen among the three subjects.
Looking at the bar chart in detail, we can see that customers bought fresh coffee most in Sydney and Melbourne by the amount with percentages respectively of approximately 43% and 42%. While instant coffee was the best seller in Brisbane at 53%, it was the least used in Sydney at just over 45%. In comparison with Melbournre , Hobart’s people who went to a cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks is smaller by a narrow margin.
Regarding Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Hobart, going to a cafe was the first choice, buying instant coffee was the second choice and the last one was buying fresh coffee of the people there. However, the opposite was true for Adelaide people. In Adelaide, a higher number of people preferred buying instant coffee to going to a cafe. At the same of the other four cities, the lowest percentage of people would rather have bought fresh coffee.
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- Many people say the gap between the rich and the poor people is wider as rich people become richer poor people become poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address these problems 56
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly used by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 73
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 61
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some people think it is unnecessary to learn foreign languages while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any r
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at going to a cafe for coffee or tea was the most chosen among the three subjects...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n see that customers bought fresh coffee most in Sydney and Melbourne by the amou...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ast used in Sydney at just over 45%. In comparison with Melbournre , Hobart’s people who w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... over 45%. In comparison with Melbournre , Hobart’s people who went to a cafe for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73853211009 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53408613586 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490825688073 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2630585391 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173033917427 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821409716305 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466494260749 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119157983557 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143813972362 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at going to a cafe for coffee or tea was the most chosen among the three subjects...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n see that customers bought fresh coffee most in Sydney and Melbourne by the amou...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ast used in Sydney at just over 45%. In comparison with Melbournre , Hobart’s people who w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... over 45%. In comparison with Melbournre , Hobart’s people who went to a cafe for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73853211009 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53408613586 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490825688073 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2630585391 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173033917427 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821409716305 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466494260749 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119157983557 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143813972362 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.