The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015. Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph given illustrates the amount of waste in a recycling centre according to four different types of materials in the period from 2011 to 2015.
Overall, it is evident that paper was almost the largest material collected among other kinds of waste. Meanwhile, there was an increase in the figure for waste in the recycling centre between 2011 and 2015.
Starting at 57 tons of paper in 2011, the number of paper recycled fell minimally to 50 in 2012. This data further decreased to the bottom of 40 in 2013. The glass experienced a downward trend from 48 in 2011 to 41 before rising to the same figure of the initial year in 2013. The statistics of tins and garden were far lower than those of paper and glass, which were at 35 and 32 respectively. These two waste materials saw neglectable drops in the next two years.
While the amount of paper climbed significantly to the highest point of 70 in the final year, that of glass shared a similar upward trend to 52 in 2015. There were some fluctuations in tins and garden collection in the remaining years. The figure of tins and gardens rose to 39 and 35, accordingly, at the end of the period.
- The table illustrates the number of international tourists in the leading eight nations in two years 2009 and 2010 and the change It is evident that France was visited the most among other countries in both years While tourist arrivals in Germany increase 78
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of the urban population in 3 continents and the whole world over the period between 1950 and 2000 and including the prediction to 2030 Overall it is evident that the population of Latin America was always highest c 73
- The idea that parks and outer spaces are replaced by gardens is more beneficial remains a source of controversy While there are many drawbacks of reducing the number of open spaces I strongly believe that the benefits are more remarkable On the one hand w 78
- It is said that the majority of television programmes had better concentrate on educating the young generation about the essential of social aspects While I partly agree with this idea other issues such as advertisement or entertainment cannot overlooked 89
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of the population living the cities in 3 continents and the whole world over the period of between 1950 and 2000 and a projected growth in 2023 Overall it is evident that the population of Latin America was always 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51904761905 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51327992148 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3313923725 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2727272727 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15735962779 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594475438405 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678051455827 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113996288811 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636913571762 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.