The chart shows components of GDP in the UK доfrom 1992 to 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the gross domestic product generated from the IT and Service Industry in the UK from 1992 to 2000. Overall, it is obvious that both increased as a percentage of GDP, however, IT remained at a higher rate throughout this time.
According to the data provided, at the beginning, in 1992, the Service Industry accounted for 4 per cent of GDP, and at the same time, IT exceeded this, at just over 6 per cent. Over the next four years, the levels became more similar, with both elements standing between 6 and just over 8 per cent. IT remained unchanged overall, though it dropped slightly from 1994 to 1996.
Nevertheless, over the following four years, the patterns of the two components were noticeably different. The percentage of GDP from IT increased pretty sharply to 12 in 1998 and then nearly 15 in 2000, while the Service Industry stayed nearly the same, increasing to only 8 per cent.
In conclusion, the percentage of GDP from IT was almost twice that of the Service Industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 84
- Home documentary movie 11
- People like to slide down and climb the mountain. What do you think about how they endangered their life? Is it a good trend? 73
- There is a dispute between people about how it is better to spend time and money on a hobby that to spend on vain on video games. 56
- People like to slide down and climb the mountain. What do you think about how they endangered their life? Is it a good trend? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...e gross domestic product generated from the IT and Service Industry in the UK from 199...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80681818182 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69942577878 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573863636364 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3723995667 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251476967199 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10970035851 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115506212594 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163554900983 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901312581671 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.