The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the gross domestic product generated from the IT and Service Industry in the UK from 1992 to 2000. Overall, it can be seen that both increased as a percentage of GDP, but IT remained at a higher rate throughout this time.
According to the data provided, at the beginning of the period, in 1992, the Service Industry accounted for 4 per cent of GDP, at the same time IT exceeded this, at just over 6 per cent. Over the next four years, the levels became more similar, with both elements standing between 6 and just over 8 per cent. IT was still higher overall, though it dropped slightly from 1994 to 1996.
Nevertheless, over the following four years, the patterns of the two components were noticeably different. The percentage of GDP from IT increased sharply to 12 in 1998 and then nearly 15 in 2000, since the Service Industry stayed nearly the same, increasing to only 8 per cent.
In conclusion, the percentage of GDP from IT was almost twice that of the Service Industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 56
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 78
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 84
- There is a dispute between people about how it is better to spend time and money on a hobby that to spend on vain on video games. 56
- Home documentary movie 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...e gross domestic product generated from the IT and Service Industry in the UK from 199...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndustry accounted for 4 per cent of GDP, at the same time IT exceeded this, at ju...
^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The percentage of GDP from IT increased sharply to 12 in 1998 and then nearly 15...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, still, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68715083799 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6419442731 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9325488569 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249302692666 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109101921536 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116016006725 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162326575129 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877987500765 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.