The chart gives information about the frequency of eating at fast-food restaurants among people in the USA from 2003 to 2013.
According to the chart, about 30% of people ate in fast food restaurants once a week or once or twice a month, while less than 5% of residents ate out every day or never over these ten years.
Look into more detail, the percentage of people who had an unhealthy diet and ate outside every day was less than 5% in 2003. During the ten years, the figure decreased to about 2.5%. About 17% of citizens ate outside several times a week in 2003. After experiencing a slight increase, the number declined again. Individuals who enjoyed eating fast food once a week occupied more than 30%. The number presented a similar trend as the former. About 30% of people tended to eat fast food once or twice a month. The proportion also experienced a fluctuation during the given years. People who ate outside a few times a year occupied nearly 15%. The amount of these people showed an upward trend. Only less than 5% of people had a healthy diet who never ate fast food.
- Some people think that printed books are no longer necessary in this digital era as all writing can be stored electronically Others think that printed books still play important roles Discuss both views and give your opinion 72
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to teach their parents parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that the women should play an equal role as men in country’s police and military fierce, such as army, while others, think women are not suitable for these king of work. Discuss and give your opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55612244898 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37425869095 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0805570691 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.6923076923 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0769230769 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61538461538 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2302890685 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842916747498 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828107140466 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205440400375 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747428995771 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.