The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016

Essay topics:

The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016.

The given bar chart depicts the proportion of three groups of firms in Australia that social media was applied for business reasons in a four-year period, starting from 2012.
Overall, the ratio of all types of companies witnessed an upward pattern whereas the opposite was true in 2015. Additionally, the large firms constituted the highest percentage, outnumbering the others over a period of five years.
In 2012, the small and medium companies had the modest figure, at 29% and 31%, respectively while the large firms started at a significant number, precisely 80%. In the next two years, the small-sized and medium-sized enterprises went up by roughly 10% and nearly 20%, in that order. The large. however, saw an inconsiderable drop, from 80% in 2012 to 78% in 2014.
On the contrary, both types of firms had a downward pattern. There was a decline in the use of social media to exactly 30% by the small and medium and to 500% by the large. Nevertheless, the figures in 2016 rose to 49% and 55% for small-sized and medium-sized enterprises while the proportion of social media usage in the large companies returned to the same level of 2012 and 2013.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-10 Ngoc Trinh 78 view
2022-03-07 cheeandy 78 view
2022-01-29 Mr. Triều 84 view
2021-12-25 KayVu 73 view
2021-08-23 Ester Nguyễn view
Essays by user Ngoc Trinh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...d nearly 20%, in that order. The large. however, saw an inconsiderable drop, from 80% i...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85858585859 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81962961978 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3826687692 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215707115228 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712751965146 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884478413474 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135803011455 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101690464943 0.0819641961636 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.