The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar graph represents, how many seats were booked by passengers in four different fare categories ( Economy, Premium Economy, Business and First) in Wright Brothers Airways in three different periods (2005, 2010 and 2015).
In summary, the percentage of passengers , who filled a seat, increased in three fare types: Economy, Premium Economy and First, whereas, it declined in the Business class, by spending time.
According to the graph, the higher proportion of passengers were booking seats in in the Premium Economy class compared to other three fare classes. Booking in the Premium Economy rose and it was 85%, 95% and 95% in 2005, 2010 and 2015 respectively. Furthermore, the Economy class and the First class were filled by the same percentage of passengers in 2005 and 2010 and it was 80%. After five years , both categories went up and reached 90% and 85% in the Economy class and the the First class respectively.
On the other hand, the highest seats were filled in the Business class (90%) in 2005. There 25% reduced after the half decade; however, there increased from 65% in 2010 to 75% in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | SaranyaJeevesh | 11 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- 1. Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social andcommercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and whatmeasuresshouldbetakentoreducethesepressures? 67
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006. 73
- The graph shows the percentage of males and females who hold each type of qualification in 2005 in NZ Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e booked by passengers in four different fare categories Economy, Premium Econom...
^^
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngers in four different fare categories Economy, Premium Economy, Business and F...
^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...In summary, the percentage of passengers , who filled a seat, increased in three f...
^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...ortion of passengers were booking seats in in the Premium Economy class compared to o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nd 2010 and it was 80%. After five years , both categories went up and reached 90%...
^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ed 90% and 85% in the Economy class and the the First class respectively. On the othe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ed 90% and 85% in the Economy class and the the First class respectively. On the othe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, whereas, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95744680851 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55174157029 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478723404255 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.071587768 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0886137742514 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481638379045 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358101896692 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636597701761 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251275494583 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.