The line chart compares and contrasts data on the difference in the Australian unemployment rate in the city and the countryside throughout the year 2012 separated into four quarters.
Generally speaking, the number of Australian people who were out of job had a tendency to fall down at the end of 2012, which opposed to their counterparts in the urban regions.
A closer look at the diagram shows that after a half year had passed, the two categories experiencing a drop to approximately 5% and a rise of 2%, then they both hit the lowest points at 4.5% and 2% in the rural areas and urban areas respectively. The rural unemployment rate trend increased and reached its top at roughly 5.5%, followed by a slight reduction of 0.5% till the end of the year. In the same period of time, however, their counterparts witnessed a gradual upward trend and finished at over 4.5%.
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 71
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 89
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The table below gives information about the underground railway system in six cities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...% till the end of the year. In the same period of time, however, their counterparts witnessed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 727.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75163398693 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83785099426 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1343403712 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.4 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1824551734 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898348395392 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764950488489 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122878391841 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076359554674 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.