the chart tells the data of consumer that buy the items from online and in-store
The charts above display the number of reasons that people give for choosing items by online or in-store. Interestingly though, it is measured in percentage. At first glance, it was evident that the highest motive is for saving the time that they have through online shopping while the direct shopping was needed because they could touch the item.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to online’s data. The upper number was reached by people having arguments for avoiding queues and saving times, it was around 31%-34%. Then, the consumers wanting shopping in every single day gained more than a fifth while to get greater variety was the lowest percentage, surely over one in ten.
Turning to the in-store’s diagram, the biggest number was 40% involving the buyer who was likely to touch the item before purchase it whereas could talk with a salesperson gained 5% lower than the dominant amount. Next, greater variety achieved 17% whilst the citizens that did not want to spend their money for delivery cost were counted approximately a half from it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- you have just an article in a national newspaper which claims that town centres in your country all look very similar to each other you don t fully agree with this opinion 70
- In many countries the costs of living are rising What are the effects of this on individuals and society Suggest solutions to this problem 73
- The line charts above representate the number of Australian coming out to Japan US China and India for the last twenty two years specifically from 1990 to 2012 It is measured in percentage 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e counted approximately a half from it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04519774011 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44253434319 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677966101695 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1964020946 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170812228967 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746307626261 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764984742215 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107606404233 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408196924863 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.