The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
The given first pie chart reveals the information about during the year 2000 the three different way using the water in world and the second horizontal graph shows the information about four different countries. data is calibrated in percentum.
It can be seen that, during the year 2000 the three different way using the water of the world. Apart from all this, the most water was using the world for agriculture that was 70%. on the other hand,during the year 2000 the water had using only for industry that was 22%. Furthermore, during the year 2000. The water had been used for domestic of the world only 8%.
As far as, trend was concerned that during the year 2000. In Canada, water was used for agriculture that was 80%. Furthermore, the water had used for industry only 8%. However, the water had been used for agriculture that was 92%. Ratherthan, In newzealand, the water was used for agriculture, industry, domestic that was 44%, 45%, and 10% respectively.
Overall, it is evident that In India, the most water had been using for agriculture as a compare to other nation.
- One should only use enough money to fulfill their need and rest should be given to needy to what extent you agree or disagree 56
- The table below gives information about favorite pastimes in different countries in percentage ? 73
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking. 56
- The graph below show the weekly earning of men and women in euros for the 16 -59 age groups as per their education level. 67
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the second horizontal graph shows the information about four different countri...
^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Data
...rmation about four different countries. data is calibrated in percentum. It can be ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...the world for agriculture that was 70%. on the other hand,during the year 2000 the...
^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , during
...iculture that was 70%. on the other hand,during the year 2000 the water had using only...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hand,during the year 2000 the water had using only for industry that was 22%. Fu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77659574468 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54088345422 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441489361702 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1555127904 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.0769230769 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4615384615 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373336501534 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156859582929 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914813177954 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244884070957 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101848839646 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.51 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.