Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking.
The given for circular chart reveals the information about the budget of food spent on restaurant meals and home-cooking .the second chart reveals the fast food vs sitdown restaurant .during the year 1970from 2000 .the data is calibrated in precentum.which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that during the year 1970 budget of food spent on restaurant meals that was 10%. In addition to this, during the year 1980 from 1990. The budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking was 15% and 30%. Moreover, during the year 2000 the budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking was equally was 50%.
As far as, trend was concerned that during the year 1970. The budget spent on sitdown restaurant meals has been decreased 20%. However, during the year 2000. The fast food meals and sitdown restaurant meals was equally.
Overall, it is evident that the budget food spent on high percentage in restaurant meals and the fast food meals had highest number of meals as compare to the sitdown restaurant meals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | 89 | view |
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 67
- One should only use enough money to fulfill their need and rest should be given to needy to what extent you agree or disagree 56
- The table below gives information about favorite pastimes in different countries in percentage ? 73
- The graph below show the weekly earning of men and women in euros for the 16 -59 age groups as per their education level. 67
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ent on restaurant meals and home-cooking .the second chart reveals the fast food v...
^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eals the fast food vs sitdown restaurant .during the year 1970from 2000 .the data...
^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...estaurant .during the year 1970from 2000 .the data is calibrated in precentum.whi...
^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rant .during the year 1970from 2000 .the data is calibrated in precentum.which is...
^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...rant meals and home cooking was equally was 50%. As far as, trend was concerned th...
^^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...estaurant meals and the fast food meals had highest number of meals as compare to the sitdo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95977011494 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50899425797 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 76.1495896246 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510116106529 0.215688989381 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2471895052 0.103423049105 239% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173319858057 0.0843802449381 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367343482231 0.15604864568 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889227994652 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.