The pie charts give nutritional information regarding three types of potentially unhealthy ingredients for different meals. Overall, dinner accounted for the highest levels of salt and saturated fat, whereas snacks accounted for the highest levels of sugar that was added.
Salt and saturated fat consumption followed similar patterns. Dinner accounted for 43% and 37%, respectively. This was followed by lunch with 29% sodium and 26% fat. Levels of sodium were the same for breakfast and snacks at 14%. Fat was significantly higher for snacks at 21% than it was for breakfast (16%).
Added sugar had roughly opposite consumption patterns. Forty-two percent of the sugar was consumed from snacks. The next highest was dinner at 23% and lunch at 19%. Breakfast accounted for the lowest percentage at only 16%.
Overall, dinner accounted for the highest levels of salt and saturated fat, whereas snacks accounted for the highest levels of sugar that was added.
As can be seen from the information above, most sodium and saturated fats were consumed for dinner, while for sugar it was snacks.
- er 11
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- With the improvements in today s health care society has to care for more and more elderly people Do you feel that society will be able to cope with the increase in numbers of elderly people today and how can it be managed Give reasons for your answer and 67
- Writing Task 1 Diagram Instant noodles manufacturing process 79
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29142857143 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63167518621 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468571428571 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6330774813 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2307692308 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4615384615 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0331582909402 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0166735179878 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395449836605 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0247061062585 0.15604864568 16% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286478528054 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.