The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A deep analysis of two following graphs reveal data on the proportion of household equipment ownerships regarding three distinct devices and how many hours per week dedicate to domestic work on average in a particular nation over a century beginning from 1920 to 2019.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the figure for ownership of all electrical appliances experienced significant growth and the vacuum cleaners becoming the most ubiquitous. However, a downward trend could be observed in the amount of time allocated for doing housework.
According to the first chart, by the time the refrigerator arrived in 1920, laundry machines and vacuum cleaners must have already been owned by 40% and 30% of families, respectively. Over the next 4 decades, the popularity of the refrigerator witnessed a dramatic increase, surpassing two other mechanical consumer durables due to be accepted in 90% of homes. This ratio was 20 per cent higher than that of washing machine and vacuum cleaner ownership which rose at the same pace. From 1980 onwards, almost all families installed refrigerators and vacuum cleaners, varied from 90% to 100%. Meanwhile, in 1980, the percentage of the household utilising laundry machine experienced a slight decline by 5%, but then increased to approximately 75% at the end of surveyed phase.
Regarding the second chart, in the starting year, each family spent 50 hours per week on household chores, which dropped a low of 20 hours in 1960. Since then, this figure underwent several highs and lows over the following 40-years stage and started to decrease to merely 10% in 2019..
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | steveminh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree 84
- In the modern world it is no looner necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clthing Do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 84
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 89
- In the modern world it is no looner necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clthing Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Arding
arding three distinct devices and how many hou...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...tarted to decrease to merely 10% in 2019..
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17338709677 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80945971065 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 106.607317073 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657258064516 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9035396382 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.3 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122378043843 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456014845897 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380583113656 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721863419939 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356277214304 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.