The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first paragraph illustrates the proportion of three electricity appliances in a country from 1920 to 2019 while the second line chart shows the hours that people spend on household in nearly a century.
Overall, it is notable that in the first diagram, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner are increased significantly and washing machine rised fluctuated by the time. Mean while the number of housework per week was true opposite for the time quantity.
Upon a closer look at appliance ownership, in the first twenty years, all three line had a upward trend, the percentage of washing machine was the highest, about 60% and wacuum cleaner was the highest line with approximate 50% at this time. In the next four and onward, almost all families installed refrigerators and vacuum cleaners, varied from 90% to 100%. Meanwhile, in 1980, the percentage of the household utilising laundry machine experienced a slight decline by 5%, but then increased to approximately 75% at the end of surveyed phase
Turning to the figures for hours spent on housework weekly, a plunge from 50 to 15 was seen over the first 60 years, and it then marginally declined to 10 hours by 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | steveminh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students Discuss these views which view do you agree with Explain why Give Reason 89
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 89
- In the modern world it is no looner necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clthing Do you agree or disagree 89
- In the modern world it is no looner necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clthing Do you agree or disagree 89
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...g machine rised fluctuated by the time. Mean while the number of housework per week was tr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... first twenty years, all three line had a upward trend, the percentage of washing...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9693877551 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77126776607 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.1427188649 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.333333333 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136437431626 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669408747439 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064500115642 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929224133331 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063914993544 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.