In the modern world it is no looner necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clthing Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

In the modern world, it is no looner necessary to use animals as food or other products, such as medicines and clthing. Do you agree or disagree?

The problem of using too many animals to provide food, medicine, and clothing has been ongoing in recent years. Some people argue that killing fauna to produce nutrients and other products is unnecessary. In my point of view, I agree with the following idea and will discuss several compelling reasons in this essay.
In modern times, we are faced with many physical condition challenges relating to poor health, including cancer and heart disease, caused by excessive consumption of meat, which contains lots of cholesterol on a regular, long-term basis. Moreover, consuming wild animals might expose us to dangerous viruses. For example, the Corona Virus exists in bats, and when we eat them, we can absolutely be infected. Fortunately, many alternative meat products are available on the market. In fact, vegetarian diets are becoming increasingly popular, and they can provide all of the nutrients that a human requires.In particular, tofu and mushrooms contain high levels of protein, a kind of nutrient presumably only found in meat. Therefore, a large number of people are going to use them as a subtitude.
Furthermore, medical experiments on animals and medicines manufactured from animals' body parts receive little endorsement today than in the past. With herbs and many other types of plant-based medicines, we can also study and find treatments for many illnesses, such as using ginseng to protect our health. More seriously, thousands of wild fauna are being killed every day as their fur is taken to produce coats and accessories for the fashion industry. There are now better ways to use eco-friendly sources like flora and to make accessories from artificial materials rather than force animals to suffer the paint and die.
In summary, I would concede that killing animals for human desires and our needs is no longer necessary. We can choose different sources of medicine and clothing without harming animals.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-22 mingchou265 89 view
2021-10-22 mingchou265 89 view
Essays by user mingchou265 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
The problems of using to much animals to provide food, medicine ...
^^
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The problems of using to much animals to provide food, medicine and c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 727, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...esumably only found in meat. Therefore, a large number of people are going to use them as a subti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...housands of wild fauna are being killed everyday with their fur are taken to produce coa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'source'?
Suggestion: source
...er necessary. We can choose a different sources of medicine and clothing without harm a...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in fact, in particular, in summary, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24509803922 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70700499272 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643790849673 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1559059401 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168668355465 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497654989749 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042967132092 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104033153157 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446192080724 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.