The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make the comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs plot the proportion of houses facilitated with electrical appliances as well as how much time is spent on undertaking domestic chores by a household in one country from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, electrical devices flourished among households, whereas the number of hours which have been allocated to housework declined in this period.
It is of note that almost every household did not possess any refrigerator in 1920. Surprisingly, the popularity of refrigerators and vacuum cleaners rocketed and refrigerators became indispensable devices in every household in 1980 and leveled off until the end. Likewise, vacuum cleaner reached the same level in 2000 then stayed stable at the beginning of the next century. In contrast, although starting with the highest percentage (40 percent), washing machine’s popularity gradually climbed and was interestingly equal to the proportion of houses with the vacuum cleaners (70 percent respectively).
On the other hand, the amount of time spent on housework per household in 1920 was 50 hours, the largest quantity reported in this graph. However, the figure dramatically plunged to 20 hours per week in 1950 before slowing down and ending up at 10 hours per week in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-27 | nguyenhuyendan1133 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-24 | Luis Pham | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | 60 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view | |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view |
- The chart below shows the different type of goods and services purchased online in Australia Canada and the United Kingdom last year 84
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners How far do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- People are likely to be a self employment 61
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, then, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31282051282 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97906789053 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646153846154 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4983835907 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173058564254 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744843156037 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845982132738 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110398016336 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774473133782 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.