The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers
Two different charts illustrate the major reasons student with different ages pursue their study and also mentions the level of assistance like time off and financial help they received from employers.
In general, scholars are greatly influenced by their career to choose their study which over time decreases marginally. However, the ratio of students who tend to build passion for studying increases steadily with increase in age. Whereas the higher employer support reduce to half over the mid year and manage to increase afterwards.
Amongst scholars under 26 80 percent of them study focusing on their career which slowly reduces to its half when they reach the age of 40-49. Later, the percentage falls dramatically to around 19 percent for people of age exceeding 49. As opposed to this, the initial age group have minimal (26%) of student to study by their interest, and the ratio increases slightly when both the reasons meet at the point of 40 percent in the age group 40-49. Unlike the beginning the ratio to study for interest jumps significantly to 70 percent for the age group over 49.
Regarding employer support by group of age, students of age below 26 receive around 61 percent assistance, but the statistics reduce by half reaching around 32 percent when in the age of 30-39. By surprise, the percentage increases gradually and reach over 40 percent for the age group exceeding 49 year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | kashyap sahil | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | Wisnu Legowo | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | 73 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- The Chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
...o different charts illustrate the major reasons student with different ages pursue thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Later, the percentage falls dramatically to around 19 percent for people of age e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02553191489 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51271461205 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.962006625 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.1 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330579880079 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136500093418 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761489113827 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21359095123 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575103680742 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.